Azure Web Apps with Cost Effective, Private and Hybrid Connectivity (The ASE Killer!)Reading Time: 10 minutes
Caution: this blog post may save you significant time and money, and has been affectionately dubbed “The ASE Killer!”.
Note: If you prefer a video walk-through, you can now view my video building this solution on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeYwTLd_zB8
With the advent of the cloud came the ever so attractive PaaS service model. The first time I heard about this, I was sold. Host my application without having to manage the infrastructure, the OS, patching, scaling and all the other things that I really don’t want to do anyways – sign me up! The “catch” is though that (to misquote all those before me) “with less responsibility comes less power”. When relinquishing responsibility (the positive side of PaaS), you also relinquish some control and ability for customization. This is a conversation I have with customers at least once a week – how do I control networking for my PaaS application.
One my peers, Steve Loethen who focuses more on the application development aspects in Azure, and I were speaking and noted that it would be great if we could leverage Azure Private Link Endpoints and Azure Application Gateway to get both private connectivity from the internal network and leverage a cloud-native Web Application Firewall for internet traffic. Traditionally using the “isolated” tier of Azure App Services called an Azure Application Service Environment (which provides a completely isolated and dedicated app service environment) would be the way to go. Unfortunately the nature of a private stamp of a PaaS service inherently comes with a pretty heft price tag. There are still some great features to be had with the ASE, but using Private Link we can get to a point where all external access is blocked unless its using the WAF – but can be still be accessed over the internet network. I’ll document that configuration below.
To setup this environment we will need to:
- Setup the Web App
- Create a Virtual Network in Azure
- Setup a Site-to-Site VPN
- Setup a Private Link Endpoint for the Web App
- Restrict Network Access to the Web App to only the Private Link Endpoint
- Setup a Public Application Gateway
*Note* As of 3/12/20 Private Link Endpoints for App Service Web Apps is in Public Preview.
As of 10/6/20 Private Link Endpoints for App Service Web Apps is Generally Available
Let’s get started! First, we’ll create the App Service. I’m going to be using the resource group named “pri-webapp-rg” and the app service name “private-webapp.azurewebsites.net” in the West US region.
*Note* At the time of writing this post (5/18/20) Private Endpoints require the App Service to be a Pv2.
I am not going to use it in this lab, but I am going to leave App Insights enabled. If you’ve not used App Insights yet as an APM tool I highly suggest you look at instrumenting your app with this tooling.
Go ahead and add any tags if you need any for your environment, then create that App Service. Next we’ll go and create our Azure Virtual Network. This will allow us to facilitate the private network connectivity. I’m going to create this in West US, I’ll note that Private Link Endpoints do not need to be deployed in the same region as the resource, but I want to reduce latency here so I’ll deploy the vnet (and subsequent Private Link Endpoints in the following steps) as the same region as the App Service.
I’m going to use the 10.2.0.0/16 address space, and initially create two subnets. The “WebApp” subnet will be for the Private Link Endpoint and the “AppGateway” subnet will be designated for the Application Gateway.
I’m going to leave the rest of the deployment settings with their default options selected for now and create the vnet.
Once the vnet has finished creating, we need to go create a “Gateway Subnet” which will be used for the VPN Gateway to be used for the Site-to-Site VPN for hybrid connectivity. By default, it will pre-select a subnet that is available in your address space. Once that subnet is created we have our finished vnet setup.
Now that the network in Azure is setup, we need to get the VPN Gateway configured. When the “West US” region is selected on the deployment screen you’ll get a list of available virtual networks in that region. I selected the one we just created, and it will validate that there is a “GatewaySubnet” created in that vnet and will select that as the deployment subnet for the VPN Gateway. I’m going to be using a Route-based VPN so I’ll select that as my VPN type then create a new public IP address and leave the Active-Active and BGP options disabled for this lab.
The VPN gateway does take 20-30 minutes to deploy, so go grab a cup of coffee. Once that’s done we’ll need to add the “connection” for the site-to-site VPN.
For this setup we’re using a Site-to-Site IPSec VPN Connection, and this is where you’ll also set your PSK and IKE protocol. You’ll also need to create a local network gateway, which is an ARM resource used for representing the on-premises network.
The “IP Address” field is where you’ll enter the public IP address of the appliance that’s going to terminate the VPN on-premises. You’ll also need to add which networks are on-prem, this will add add the local network address space to the route table of the VPN Gateway so it knows to use that link for traffic bound for those addresses.
Once that’s created, we’ll need to go to the overview page for the VPN Gateway to get its public IP address. That will be needed to setup the on-premises side of the VPN. I’m going to use a PFSense appliance in home lab network to accomplish this setup. If you want to test this just in Azure you can also use just a vnet peered network and create an emulated “client” machine, alternatively you could also setup a point-to-site VPN for just your local machine. I won’t be showing that process here, but I have another post that discusses the setup of PFSense S2S VPN with an Azure VPN Gateway and another that uses PaloAlto for S2S VPN to Azure.
Once the S2S VPN is setup, we can now go and setup the Private Link Endpoint for the App Service.
When choosing a private link endpoint you need to choose the resource type, so here I’m using the “Microsoft.Web/sites” resource type.
As noted earlier on, we created the “WebApp” subnet to hold the private link endpoint and we’ll select that here. A very important component of private link is DNS. As is stated so eloquently in my favorite Haku:
“It’s not DNS
There’s no way it’s DNS
It was DNS”.
Before deploying private link you have to consider the DNS scenario. Clients cannot call private link endpoints by their IP addresses, it has to be by their DNS names. I highly recommend some of the Microsoft Documentation on the topic, or Daniel Mauser has an amazing article on Private Link DNS Integration Scenarios. I’m going to go ahead and allow the private endpoint to create an Azure Private DNS Zone, but ultimately for this lab environment I’ll just be using a host file entry.
*Note* You can also check out my post on automated IaaS DNS Load Balancing to help with the private, hybrid DNS integration scenarios that may be required for Private Link here: DNS Load Balancing in Azure.
Alright, the private link endpoint is all setup. Now to make sure we restrict network traffic to that which only originates from the private link endpoint. App Services can use virtual network service endpoints to restrict traffic originating from vnets in Azure quite easily. Though in our case we want to make sure that on-premises traffic can also access that app service so rather than allowing access at the vnet level we’ll just be allowing the single IP of the private endpoint.
After adding the access restriction rule, you’ll see that the “Allow All” rule switches to a “Deny All” rule and is given the lowest priority on the ACL. Above that we have the single IP of the Private Link Endpoint that is allowed. As a result, the only IP that’s allowed to call this app service is that of the private link endpoint.
Great! Okay, now we’ve setup my app service, my site-to-site VPN, private link, and access restrictions. We should be all set to test connectivity from on-premises now, let’s go give that a shot. As noted above, since this is just a lab environment I’m just going to be using a host file entry on my test machine on my lab network, so lets set that up real quick.
Great, now let’s validate this in a browser and with powershell to both make sure the page loads and that it’s using the private endpoint. We can see that the page loads using the “public” DNS name, but the address is the 10.2.2.4 address that is assigned to the private link endpoint. We can also see that on a machine that’s just using the typical internet path is given a 403, since the source traffic is not coming from the private endpoint – perfect!
If we go back and look at the site-to-site VPN configuration now we’ll also see that traffic has started passing over that link which further validates the fact that the traffic is remaining private.
Now that we have confirmed the hybrid traffic is passing through the private endpoint and that all internet traffic is denied, let’s configure the Application Gateway with the Web Application Firewall SKU so that we can facilitate external traffic communicating with our private Web App (forgive my ever so descriptive naming convention) and create a new public IP address to be associated with the Application Gateway. Lastly, we’ll use the subnet that we designated earlier for the Application Gateway for the deployment.
When creating the backend pool we’ll enter the IP address of the private link endpoint. For the routing rule, since this is a lab and I don’t have a TLS certificate on-hand I’ll use an HTTP listener on the App Gateway and use the same HTTPS endpoint for the App Service that we’ve been using internally. In a production environment you’ll want to have HTTPS on the public listener. When creating the HTTP setting to use for this routing rule we want to override the host name to that of the App Service (in this case, “private-webapp.azurewebsites.net”) because remember that private link needs to be called using a DNS name and this way we can add that host name to the request header.
*Note* Since we deployed a Private DNS Zone, which is automatically attached to our virtual network, and the application gateway is deployed into the virtual network, we can use the DNS name of the app here because it will resolve correctly. Though, for clarity in this lab environment I’m just using the IP address.
After the Application Gateway is finished deploying I want to go add a DNS label to the public IP which is associated and confirm that it was applied so I can use that DNS name rather than the IP itself.
Okay, moment of truth! Remember the machine we used earlier that used the public path to get to the app service but got a 403 error because of the access restrictions? Let’s go ahead and try hitting the newly provisioned Application Gateway that does have a public listener and try the site now. We see that it’s using the DNS label and subsequent HTTP listener that we setup on the App Gateway, using the public interface and is routing us appropriately back to our private web app!
That’s all folks! As a retrospective, here’s what we’ve done:
- Configured an App Service with Hybrid, Private Networking
- Configured a scalable public endpoint that’s using a WAF in an IDS mode
- Maintained the flexibility, scalability, and cost effectiveness of the non-ASE App Service
If you have any questions or suggestions for future blog posts feel free to comment below, or reach out to me via email, twitter, or LinkedIn.
10/8/20: Private Endpoints for App Service Web Apps now GA
12/25/20: Updated with link to new blog post for “Azure Site-to-Site VPN with a PaloAlto Firewall“
12/27/20: Updated with link to new blog post for “DNS Load Balancing in Azure“
Custom “Virtual Network Operator” Role in AzureReading Time: 4 minutes
*Edit* 6/9/20: At the time of writing this blog custom roles were not available in the Azure Portal. Since that feature now exists, I’ve added how to create this role through the portal to the end of this blog.
We all know that cloud environments are different than on premises. Development environments can be even more difficult, the right cross between giving freedom to produce business value and enough security and controls to maintain a good security posture. Recently I came across a scenario where the design was that the networking components (Virtual Network, S2S VPN, Peerings, Service Endpoints, UDRs, Subnets, etc.) were all under the control of a Networking team so that the Azure environment would be an extension of their local network. From a permissions standpoint though this caused some problems. The goal would be to empower developers to build whatever they need and just attach it to the vNet when connectivity was needed, with the caveat that they shouldn’t be able to modify any of the network settings or configurations in the shared vNet. This however, turned out not to be possible with default IAM roles.
In my testing, even though you’re not “modifying” anything per se in the vNet – when attaching a network interface card to a Subnet it does require write access. Reader access will give the user this error.
After looking through the default IAM roles, there aren’t any that do what I need them to do. Alas, a custom role is needed. For reference, please checkout this docs page for custom roles – https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/custom-roles.
First, I need to see what actions are available to pack into the custom role so I run the following command in Azure Powershell and get these results.
Get-AzProviderOperation “Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/*” | FT OperationName, Operation, Description -AutoSize
Great, now I can see what is available. It looks like the actions that I need are the /subnet/join/action and /subnet/joinViaServiceEndpoint/Action. Based on the descriptions these two will essentially give “operator” role to the vnet. The assignee will be able to use the subnet(s) but not able to modify them.
Next, you can use one of the template references in the Microsoft Docs link (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/custom-roles-powershell#create-a-custom-role-with-json-template) and modify the actions.
“Name”: “Custom – Network Operator Role”,
“Description”: “Allows for read access to Azure network and join actions for service endpoints and subnets.”,
After modifying the assignable subscription IDs, save that as a .json file and use it in the following command to import the custom role.
New-AzRoleDefinition -InputFile “C:\FileFolderLocationPath\CustomNetworkOperatorRole.json”
After a portal refresh you get the custom role available as an IAM role assignment.
There you go, after assigning this role the user was able to create VMs and attach them to the Virtual Network while still leaving control of the Network configuration to the Networking Team.
EDIT 6/9/20: Now that custom roles are available in the portal I’ve added how to create this role that way below.
Using the documentation on how to create custom IAM roles in the Azure portal you can clone any role, but I’m just going to use the “Network Contributor” role to clone.
I am going to just “start from scratch”, though you can easily use this page to modify the permissions set of a certain role that already exists. Additionally, if you have the JSON (like we generated before with powershell) you can just upload that here.
Now go ahead and add new permissions by going to the “Microsoft Network” Category and selecting the same permissions we wrote in the JSON and used with the powershell command above.
After adding those the next page will show you the permission that you’ve added, let’s double check those and make sure we have what we need.
Looks good, now we can set a scope where this role can be applied. I have this one scoped to the whole subscription, but you can use the interface to easily change that on this page.
Alright, that’s about it – let’s take a quick look at the summary pages. You can see that the portal actually generates the JSON, which is nice if you want to assign roles using Azure Policy or any other automation tooling.
Nice! Now we can see that users can use the four above actions which will allow them to interact with, and use a shared hub-style virtual network while now allowing full contributor access.
I hope I’ve made your day at least a little bit easier!
If you have any questions or suggestions for future blog posts feel free to comment below, or reach out to me via email, twitter, or LinkedIn.